How 5 Successful Brands Chose Their Names: Lessons for Founders
From Notion to Vercel to Linear, the stories behind memorable brand names — and what you can learn from their naming decisions.
On this page
Every successful brand name looks obvious in hindsight. Of course “Stripe” works for a payments company. Of course “Linear” fits a project management tool. But these names were not obvious when they were chosen. They were bets, made by founders who weighed tradeoffs and committed.
Studying how these names were chosen reveals patterns you can apply to your own naming process. Not rules to follow blindly, but frameworks for thinking about what makes a name work.
Here are five tech brands that got naming right, and the specific lessons each one teaches.
1. Notion — Owning a Common Word Through Context
What they do: All-in-one workspace for notes, docs, databases, and project management.
The name: “Notion” is a common English word meaning an idea, concept, or belief. It has been in the dictionary for centuries. By every conventional branding rule, it should be a terrible name for a tech company. It is generic, unsearchable, and already claimed in a thousand contexts.
And yet it works brilliantly.
Why it works:
Notion succeeded because they built such a dominant presence in their category that the word now means their product in professional contexts. When someone says “I put it in Notion,” nobody thinks they mean a vague idea. Context disambiguates.
The word itself is perfect for what the product does. Notion is about capturing ideas, organizing thoughts, and building knowledge systems. The name is a metaphor for the product’s core purpose.
They also got lucky with timing. When Notion launched, there was no major tech company using the name. The domain notion.so (using the .so TLD) was available, and they later acquired notion.com as they grew.
The lesson: Common words can work if the word has a strong conceptual connection to your product and you can build enough presence to own it in your context. But you need to be prepared for a harder SEO battle early on, and you should expect domain and handle challenges. This strategy works best if you have the runway and ambition to become the dominant association for that word.
The tradeoff: Try Googling “notion” today and the company dominates results. But it took years and millions in brand building to get there. A bootstrapped startup cannot afford the same strategy. If you choose a common word, you are betting on your ability to outgrow the word’s existing meanings.
2. Vercel — A Rebrand That Unlocked Global Growth
What they do: Frontend cloud platform for deploying web applications, creators of Next.js.
The name before: Vercel was originally called ZEIT (German for “time”). When they rebranded in April 2020, they chose “Vercel” — a completely invented word.
Why they rebranded:
ZEIT had several problems. The pronunciation was unclear for English speakers (is it “zite”? “zeet”? “tsite”?). The word had existing meanings in German that created ambiguity. And as the company expanded globally, a non-English word created friction.
Why Vercel works:
“Vercel” has no prior meaning in any language, which means zero trademark conflicts and instant global availability. The word has a vaguely technical, premium feel — it sounds like it could be related to “velocity” or “vertex” without actually meaning either.
The name is:
- Easy to pronounce in any language
- Easy to spell after hearing it once
- Short (six letters, two syllables)
- Available as a .com domain
- Globally available across platforms and registries
The lesson: Invented words give you maximum flexibility. No trademark battles, no SEO competition for the brand term, no pronunciation confusion across languages. The cost is that an invented word carries no inherent meaning. You have to build all of the associations from scratch.
If you are building a company you expect to scale globally, a fanciful name is the safest legal and branding choice. The fact that it “means nothing” is actually its superpower — it means whatever you make it mean.
The tradeoff: Nobody hears “Vercel” and immediately understands what the company does. The name requires explanation. But for a developer-focused company with strong word-of-mouth, that is a minor cost.
3. Linear — Precision in Simplicity
What they do: Issue tracking and project management for software teams.
The name: “Linear” is a common English adjective meaning arranged in or extending along a straight line, or progressing from one stage to another in a direct way.
Why it works:
Linear chose a word that perfectly describes their product philosophy. The tool is designed to be fast, direct, and streamlined. Issues move linearly through a pipeline. The workflow is not circular or chaotic. Everything moves forward.
The name also sounds clean and modern. It has the same quality as the product itself: precise, no wasted elements.
Linear secured linear.app as their domain, which has become increasingly common for software products. They did not need linear.com (which would have been prohibitively expensive and is owned by Linear Technology / Analog Devices, a semiconductor company).
The lesson: An adjective can be a powerful name when it describes not just what your product is, but how it feels to use it. Linear does not describe the product’s features. It describes the experience. This creates an emotional connection that a descriptive name like “FastTracker” never could.
Choosing an adjective also works well when paired with a relevant TLD. You may not get the .com, but .app, .dev, .io, or even .so can work perfectly if the word plus TLD combination feels natural.
The tradeoff: “Linear” exists in many contexts. There is Linear Technology. There are mathematical uses. Linear algebra is a college course. The team had to build SEO authority specifically around software and project management contexts. With a strong product and word-of-mouth growth, they did.
4. Figma — An Invented Name Built for Global Scale
What they do: Collaborative design tool for interface design, prototyping, and design systems.
The name: “Figma” is not a standard English word. It is derived from the word “figment” (as in figment of the imagination), trimmed down to something shorter and punchier.
Why it works:
Figma had almost no naming conflicts when it launched. The word was effectively unclaimed across domains, trademarks, social handles, and package registries. This gave the company clean ownership from day one.
The name is:
- Five letters, two syllables
- Phonetically clear in any language
- Easy to spell from hearing it
- Distinct enough to never be confused with another product
- Short enough to work as both a brand name and a verb (“just Figma it”)
The “fig” root gives it a subtle warmth and organic feel. It is not cold or technical. For a design tool, that tonal fit matters.
The lesson: Trimming or modifying a real word is one of the most effective naming strategies. You get a hint of meaning (figment, imagination, creativity) without the baggage of an existing word. And you get near-universal availability.
This approach gives you the best of both worlds: a name that feels like it could mean something, without the trademark and SEO complications of a name that actually does.
How to apply this: Take words related to your product’s core concept. Shorten them. Combine fragments. Add or remove syllables. Figma from “figment.” Spotify from “spot” + “identify.” Twilio from “twilight.” These names feel natural even though they are manufactured.
5. Stripe — A Common Word as a Strong Metaphor
What they do: Payment infrastructure for the internet.
The name: “Stripe” is a common English word. A stripe is a long, narrow band or strip, often of a different color or texture from the surface on either side of it.
Why it works:
The metaphor operates on multiple levels. A stripe on a credit card. The magnetic stripe that processes payments. Stripes as a visual element (think racing stripes — speed, performance). The word evokes precision and movement.
Patrick and John Collison chose a name that works as an abstract metaphor rather than a literal description. They did not call their company “PaymentProcessor” or “DevPay.” They chose a word that creates a visual and conceptual association without being heavy-handed about it.
Stripe also had a key advantage: it secured stripe.com early. For a company that would become a cornerstone of internet commerce, owning the exact .com match was critical.
The lesson: Common words work exceptionally well when they function as metaphors rather than descriptions. “Stripe” does not describe what the company does. It evokes a feeling and an image that aligns with the product’s identity.
The key is finding a word where the metaphorical connection is strong enough that it feels intentional, but subtle enough that it does not feel forced. Stripe feels right for a payments company. It would feel wrong for, say, a note-taking app.
The tradeoff: Stripe had to compete with every other use of the word “stripe” in search results. They won that battle through product dominance and massive brand authority. But for the first few years, searching for “stripe” returned clothing patterns, not payment APIs.
Patterns Across All Five
Looking at these names together, several patterns emerge:
Short Names Win
| Brand | Letters | Syllables |
|---|---|---|
| Notion | 6 | 2 |
| Vercel | 6 | 2 |
| Linear | 6 | 3 |
| Figma | 5 | 2 |
| Stripe | 6 | 1 |
Every name is five or six letters. None exceed three syllables. In a world where your name is typed into URLs, search bars, terminal commands, and text messages, brevity is a competitive advantage.
The Domain Did Not Have to Be .com
- Notion started with
notion.so - Linear uses
linear.app - Figma and Stripe and Vercel all secured .com, but only Vercel launched with it
Do not let .com availability kill a great name. Alternative TLDs work, especially in tech.
Every Name Has a Tonal Fit
Notion sounds thoughtful. Vercel sounds fast and technical. Linear sounds precise. Figma sounds creative. Stripe sounds sharp. The phonetics of the name match the product’s personality. This is not accidental.
When evaluating a name, say it out loud in the context of your product. “We built it in [name].” “Have you tried [name]?” “I love [name].” Does it feel right? Trust that instinct.
None of These Names Describe the Product
Not one of these names tells you what the product does. Zero. And that is fine. The name’s job is not to explain the product. The name’s job is to be memorable, distinctive, and emotionally resonant. The product explains itself.
How to Apply These Lessons
If you want maximum safety: Invent a word. Follow the Figma or Vercel path. Trim a real word, combine fragments, or fabricate something phonetically pleasing. Check availability across all platforms — Qezir can run this check across 85+ platforms in seconds. If the invented word is available everywhere, you have a clean slate.
If you want conceptual depth: Choose a common word that works as a metaphor, like Stripe or Notion. Be prepared for a longer SEO battle and potential trademark complications. Make sure the metaphorical connection is genuine, not forced.
If you want to describe the experience: Pick an adjective like Linear. Not a feature description, but an experience description. What does using your product feel like? Fast? Calm? Bold? That is your name.
If your current name has problems: Consider the Vercel path. A rebrand is not failure. It is strategic evolution. If your name is hard to pronounce, spell, or remember, a new name might unlock growth you did not know was being blocked.
The Naming Decision Framework
Before settling on a name, run it through these questions:
- Can you say it in a sentence without explaining it? “We use [name] for [purpose].”
- Can someone spell it after hearing it once?
- Is it available where it needs to be? Domains, handles, registries.
- Does it sound like your product feels?
- Will it still work if you expand into adjacent markets?
- Are there trademark conflicts in your class?
No name will score perfectly on all six. But the best names score well on most. The five brands in this post prove that there is no single formula, but there are principles that reliably produce strong outcomes.
The name is not the product. But the name is the first impression, the word-of-mouth vector, and the brand’s permanent address. Choose it with the care it deserves.
Related Articles
How to Choose a Brand Name That Works Everywhere
A practical framework for choosing a brand name that's available across domains, social media, and app stores. The complete naming checklist for founders.
Checking Package Name Availability: npm, PyPI, Crates, and Beyond
For developer tools and open-source projects, your package name matters as much as your domain. How to check and claim names across registries.
Domain Name Strategy for Startups: .com, New TLDs, and When to Compromise
Should you hold out for the .com? Is .io dead? A pragmatic guide to domain strategy for founders who need to launch, not wait.